Top Democrat threatens to hold Attorney General Barr in contempt

Written by on May 2, 2019

Nadler’s comments indicate that Democrats are prepared to escalate a showdown with the Trump administration.

A Democratic US congressional committee chairman said on Thursday he may hold Attorney General William Barr in contempt of Congress if he does not hand over a complete version of Special Counsel Robert Mueller‘s report on Russian interference in the 2016 presidential election.

Barr canceled his scheduled appearance on Thursday before the House of Representatives Judiciary Committee after clashing with Democratic Chairman Jerrold Nadler over the format of the hearing. Barr testified on Wednesday before the Republican-led Senate Judiciary Committee, stoutly defendingRepublican President Donald Trump in the wake of the release of the Mueller report.

“We will have no choice but to move quickly to hold the attorney general in contempt if he stalls or fails to negotiate in good faith,” Nadler said at the outset of a brief meeting held in place of Barr’s testimony.
Nadler painted the confrontation with Barr in stark terms.

“Ladies and gentleman, the challenge we face is that the president of the United States wants desperately to prevent Congress, the co-equal branch of the government, from providing any check whatsoever to even his most reckless decisions,” Nadler said.

“He is trying to render Congress inert as a separate and co-equal branch of government. The challenge we face is that if we don’t stand up to him together today we risk forever losing the power to stand up to any president in the future. The very system of government of the United States, the system of limited power, the system of not having a president as a dictator is very much at stake,” Nadler said.

Escalating showdown

Nadler’s comments indicated that Democrats are prepared to escalate a showdown with Trump’s administration, which has resisted their demands for documents and information on a wide range of topics, from Trump’s taxes to his potential financial conflicts of interest. READ MORE

Post-Mueller: Can Trump block witnesses, access to documents?

The Justice Department said on Wednesday it would not comply with a subpoena issued by Nadler’s committee seeking an unredacted copy of Mueller’s report and evidence gathered in the 22-month investigation. Democrats have said they may issue a subpoena to try to force Barr to testify before their committee.

Barr, whose on April 18 released a version of the report with parts blacked out to protect sensitive information, spent more than four hours at a Senate hearing on Wednesday defending his handling of the report on Russia’s interference in Tump’s favour and whether Trump subsequently tried to obstruct Mueller’s probe.

The report, almost two years in the making, detailed a series of acts by Trump to impede the probe, but did not conclude whether those actions constituted the crime of obstruction. Barr and Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein subsequently concluded that Trump, who has repeatedly called the Mueller probe a “witch-hunt”, did not break the law. The report did find that Trump and his campaign did not engage in a criminal conspiracy with Moscow. 

Barr is under fire for how he characterised the Mueller report in a summary on March 24, several weeks before the findings were released. Trump seized on Barr’s summary to declare he had been fully exonerated. READ MORE

US Attorney General Barr defends actions after Mueller complaint

A day before Wednesday’s hearing it was revealed that Mueller sent Barr a letter on March 27 that said Barr’s four-page summary of the report sent to Congress “did not fully capture the context, nature, and substance” of the special counsel’s investigation.

“There is now public confusion about critical aspects of the results of our investigation. This threatens to undermine a central purpose for which the Department appointed the Special Counsel: to assure full public confidence in the outcome of the investigations,” Mueller wrote.

Barr said on Wednesday that in a phone call with Mueller after he received the letter the special counsel “was very clear” that “he was not suggesting that we had misrepresented his report”.

US Attorney General William Barr testifies before the Senate Judiciary Committee on ‘The Justice Department’s Investigation of Russian Interference with the 2016 Presidential Election’ [Nicholas Kamm/AFP] 

Democrats have said Barr gave misleading testimony to Congress about criticism he received from Mueller over the handling of the disclosure of the report’s conclusions.

Barr’s decision to skip Thursday’s House appearance came after the committee adopted a more aggressive format with an extra hour of questioning from committee lawyers, in addition to those from the panel’s politicians.

The Justice Department on Wednesday called the conditions “unnecessary” and staff questions inappropriate.

Politicians are also seeking testimony from Mueller as soon as this month.


Reader's opinions

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Current track